Sunday, 1 April 2012

Indonesia's shipwrecks mean riches and headaches


Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Mamat Evendi straps on his primitive breathing device _ a garden hose attached to a compressor on the back of his wooden fishing boat. Pulling down his goggles, he splashes flippers-first into the crystal blue water
Indonesia's shipwrecks mean riches and headaches
A few minutes later he's flashing a 'thumbs up,' pointing first to a massive, coral-encrusted anchor, then a bronze cannon and finally, peeking up from the sand, the buried deck of a 17th century European ship. Nearby are pieces of blue-and-white ceramics. A tiny perfume bottle. A sword handle. Broken wine flasks, one still sealed with a wooden cork.
The wreck is just 6 meters (20 feet) underwater, one of four pushed into view after a tsunami slammed into the Mentawai Islands of Indonesia just over a year ago. They are among possibly 10,000 vessels littering the ocean floor of what for more than a millennium has been a crossroads for world trade.
For historians, the wrecks are time capsules, a chance to peer directly into a single day, from the habits of the crew and the early arrival of religion to contemporary tastes in ceramics.
But for Evendi and other fishermen involved in the new discoveries, it's not the past they see. It's the future. A chance, maybe, to strike it rich.
"They keep telling me, 'Let's just break them open, get the stuff out,'" said Hardimansyah, a local maritime official who has taken it upon himself to protect the wrecks as the government wrangles over a new policy on underwater heritage.
"To be honest, I'm getting frustrated, too," he says, noting he's already given the best artifacts pulled from the coral and sand to military and political officials who stop by his office from time to time to see what's been found.
"Gifts," he calls them, or "offerings."
"It's hard to say no if they ask."
___
Indonesia _ a sprawling archipelago nation straddling the equator _ remains desperately poor despite its vast oil, coal and gold reserves. Its graveyard of ships from Asia, Europe and the Middle East _ one of the biggest in the world with nearly 500 wrecks identified so far _ has long been coveted as yet another resource to exploit.
The most valuable, packed with everything from 9th century ceramics and imperial-quality gold boxes to exquisite jewels, funeral urns and inkwells, can bring in tens of millions of dollars.
That has created a small, lively industry for fishermen, who are often the discoverers of the wrecks. Those that aren't immediately looted have been sold to commercial salvage companies, which pull up the cargo as quickly as possible and then sell it off piece by piece at international auctions.
The government, which gets 50 percent of all proceeds and half the cargo, decided to wrest greater control over the riches of the sea after being left empty-handed following one of the most significant hauls, a 9th century Arab sailing vessel whose presence pointed to previously unknown trading links between China and the Middle East.
"It's frustrating," said Horst Liebner, an expert on Indonesia's maritime history, who has helped catalog artifacts and shipbuilding techniques for both the government and salvage crews. "Because in the end, this isn't about the odd treasure chest guarded by an octopus. It's about the knowledge we can gain from proper excavation."
With tens of thousands of artifacts already handed over, Indonesian museums should by now be richly stocked. Instead, shelves are all but bare. The most exquisite pieces have "disappeared." And those of little or no monetary value are in musty warehouses, closed to the public.
Pictures remain on disk drives and painstaking research goes unpublished.
"In the end, all the artifacts, everything you put into data-basing," said Liebner, "it's just for nothing in this country, it seems. No one cares."
For-profit excavations in the sea are legal in several countries, including Indonesia, that have yet to sign a 2001 U.N. convention on protecting underwater cultural heritage. But they rarely spark the outrage they would if carried out on land.
That's in part because maritime archaeology is a relatively new discipline, developed only after World War II, and neither lawmakers nor the public have kept pace with the technological advances that have turned it from a romantic hobby into a thriving business.
Historians, however, abhor the practice.
"They are recovering only things that are monetarily valuable, and that might represent just 1 or 2 percent of the entire artifact assemblage," said Paul F. Johnston of the National Museum of American History in Washington.
"Sometimes they blast through, dynamite, or pull apart artifacts that are historically or archaeologically far more important."
International auction houses have also played a part by creating markets for the artifacts, he and others say, as have governments and museums that buy them and put them on display.
Slowly, however, attitudes are changing.
After a chorus of criticism, the Smithsonian Institution announced in December it was canceling a planned exhibition of cargo from the Arab vessel, which was found in 1998.
The German company involved in the excavations pulled up more than 60,000 pieces of China's Tang Dynasty ceramics in just a few months, and then sold it to Singapore for $40 million.
Indonesia got $2.8 million _ a mere fraction of what it was owed under its own law _ and thousands of artifacts.
Privately, officials were furious.
But no one protested, presumably because the deal was linked to under-the-table "gifts" to high-ranking officials, as was common during and immediately after the collapse of Gen. Suharto's dictatorship.
"I don't think anyone will ever know exactly what happened," said Helmi Suriya, director of the Underwater Heritage from the Education and Culture Ministry, with a laugh.
"Even when I asked, I didn't get an answer," he said. "But that was a different era. We didn't even have an anti-corruption commission then."
Indonesia has embraced democracy since Suharto's ouster, and in 2010 it passed a law protecting underwater cultural heritage. But guidelines for implementation have been stalled by infighting.
Some officials, including Suriya, argue artifacts should stay inside the country, either beneath the water, as favored by UNESCO, or auctioned off locally.
"We should only allow underwater excavation for research and knowledge purposes, not for commercial," he said.
Others say, in a graft-ridden country of some 18,000 islands and more than 50,000 kilometers (30,000 miles) of coastline, that's unrealistic.
Wrecks left where they are will be immediately looted. And no one, least of all the government, will assume the cost or risk excavations without the promise of a big payoff, they say.
So for now, all excavations are on hold.
Fred Dobberphul, a German diver, who has been involved numerous salvage projects in the last two decades, says that's causing its own problems.
"Those of us who are legal, who have a legal company, we are not allowed to work," he said.
"But everyone else is going out and looting _ the fishermen too," he said. "They bring it up to the antique shops and go to the collectors and it's gone. All the information is gone."
___
So far 463 wrecks have been discovered off Indonesia, according to the National Committee of Underwater Heritage, made up of representatives from 15 ministries and government bodies, but up to 10,000 more are believed to be on the ocean floor, according to documents from China and other countries about ships that headed here never to return.
Almost all have been found in the waters between Indonesia and the Asian mainland. Only around a dozen have ever been found in the Mentawais, a string of tiny islands on the western side of the country, where the open seas were riskier.
But that doesn't mean those westerly isles don't have a story to tell, said Liebner, the maritime expert.
They doomed ships may have been visiting ports or naval bases along Sumatra island's western coast, he said, or dodging hefty taxes or pirate-infested waters.
But there's little chance of finding out, he said, noting that looters will probably get there first.
Hardimansyah, who has just spent four days with his crew at the site of the 17th century 'luxury' ship, is starting to believe that too.
His teams of fishermen jump back into the water to cover the deck with sand and coral and then prepare for their 16-hour overnight voyage home.
As they pull the hoses back onto the deck and wrap them into a tight coils, the sun dips beneath the horizon, streaking the ash sky with heavy strokes of orange.
The captain cranks up the engine and, as it settles into a low murmur, a group of dolphins arrive, swimming alongside the blue-and-red boat.
The romance, however, has worn off for Evendi and the other men.
"I'm really getting tired of waiting," says the 40-year-old father of three as one diver pulls out a guitar and another prepares a meal of fresh lobster.
Normally, he spends his days scouring the reefs for Nemos and other marine life for saltwater aquarium.
But now, he says with a smile, he has the treasure hunting bug as well.
"I don't want to be a fisherman for the rest of my life."
Source: Associated Press, March 31, 2012

Relive Genghis Khan’s dark past at a new exhibit



David Nelson and Kristen Kellar / MEDILL
Field Museum presents artifacts from the reign of Genghis Khan.

Relive Genghis Khan’s dark past at a new exhibit

BY DAVID B. NELSONAND KRISTEN KELLAR
MARCH 07, 2012


MongoliaMap
Courtesy of the Field Museum.
Genghis Khan's Mongolian Empire consumed a majority of Asia and parts of Europe.

A new Field Museum exhibit brings the infamous, bloodthirsty Genghis Khan back to life.

The exhibit, named for the warrior, runs through September 3 and brings together weapons, clothing and even a mummy, called the “giant princess.”

“There are a lot of cultural artifacts from 13th century Mongolia, but also from today. So there’s kind of a broad history of Mongolia,” said Tom Skwerski, project manager at the Field Museum.

Other show-stoppers on exhibit include replicas of a trebuchet (a catapault) and giant crossbow, silk clothing, musical instruments and diplomatic passports.

Skwerski said what people know of Genghis Khan might only come from movies, which depict him as a bloodthirsty warlord, but there is a lot more to him than that.

"I knew he was a great warrior and I knew that the Mongolian empire had spread. I didn’t know much else about him,” said Kathy Hawkins, a math teacher from Houston who was visiting at the museum.

One of the things Hawkins said she liked most was learning that Genghis Khan was responsible for innovations such as libraries, minced meat and forks, among other things. “I didn’t realize his empire was the one that introduced money to the Europeans and the express ponies, like the postal service. It’s interesting to me,” said Hawkins.

“He wasn’t a creator, he was an adapter. He took the best parts of a lot of the cultures he conquered and adapted them into the Mongol empire,” Skwerski said. “The concept of diplomatic passports, he took the idea from the Chinese and said ‘hey, this is a really good idea. Let’s not kill all the envoys that come, let’s give them immunity when they come to visit.’”

“I like to know about the expansion and how the [mongol] empire grew and then collapsed,” Jamie Shick, a science and math teacher, added. Shick said she liked that the exhibit was able to tie-in history as well as science through artifacts and videos.

There is also a full-size “ger,” or a tent used by people travelling with herds, for people to explore. Even though gers were used in the time of Genghis Khan, Skwerski said one third of the people in Mongolia still reside in them.

Prior to working on the exhibit, Skwerski said he didn’t know much about the warrior, but he now knows a lot and hopefully the exhibit will do the same for people.

He said: “It’s interesting to learn the real story behind it and what he was able to do in a very short time. Twenty-five years to create an empire twice the size of the Roman Empire is just really amazing.”

In order to preserve the artifacts, the museum uses both high and low-tech options. The gallery is temperature and humidity controlled, said Skwerski. And, filters also cover the lights within the exhibit so the objects don’t deteriorate from the light. But, to control the humidity in the mummy’s case, silica gel packets are placed within the case.

The man who discovered the lost Great Wall


BEIJING, Mar. 28 (Xinhuanet) -- Recently, an Englishman who is possibly the world's most prominent Great Wall enthusiast has made headlines in over 40 countries around the world. His story regarding the "lost Great Wall" has been the most read story on National Geographic's website. He recently spoke at Beijing's Trends Lounge, where he shared stories and insights. In 1987, William Lindesay came to China to trek the wall's entire 2470 km length, where he was arrested nine times, and deported once. At the time, it was very difficult for foreigners to gain entry to China, and Lindesay knew that his goal of hiking the wall was technically forbidden. "I had to come to terms that if I wanted to succeed on my mission I had to have a philosophy of trespass I call it. Because I'm a very law-abiding citizen. Trespass is a crime, I suppose." Armed with a negligible grasp of Chinese and a small rucksack, he began hiking the wall. He also had a notebook in which he had a message written in Chinese, asking for the essentials for survival. "I just hoped that they'd give me the water, food and shelter that I needed. And they did. Day after day after day. Actually… my journey in '87 was 78 days and I stayed with more than 60 farming families, and they were all incredibly warm-hearted." The message also asked his hosts to write their names and village name for him. Incredibly, 20 years later Lindesay used his notebook to pay a surprise second visit to the families who had helped him before. They were amazed that the strange visitor hadn't forgotten them. Not only did Lindesay meet with families, he also was reunited with the police officers who had arrested and deported him. But this time, he wasn't a trespasser: he was a hero. He met the mayor and the party secretary, and was made an honorary citizen for his esteemed work preserving the Great Wall. Photos he'd taken on his first trip were exhibited in the Yulin cultural square. Lindesay's story was now a symbol for China's opening up, as Beijing Evening News ran a feature called "From Trespasser to Honorary Citizen in Yulin."




William Lindesay's research on the great wall was greatly influenced by another William: William Geil. Lindesay was amazed to receive a book by William Geil, which contained photos of the Great Wall taken in 1905. The book was passed on to him by Geil's widow, who knew that Lindesay could appreciate it. Not only did Lindesay appreciate it; it became the basis for his next research project. Lindesay knew that re-shooting Geil's photos of the Great Wall would concretely prove how well the wall was surviving, or how badly it was crumbling. Lindesay appreciated how he and Geil not only shared their given names and a propensity for Indiana-Jones-style hats; they also shared a love for China's Great Wall, often having photographed identical pictures of its curves and towers. Lindesay's appreciation for Geil called him to find Geil's relatives in the states. Lindesay knew Geil must have had journal writings, notes, and a large collection of photos. Lindesay combed the internet, called hospitals and funeral homes, but to no avail. He resigned himself to just one way to find Geil. "I thought the more stories I get out about William Geil, the more chance there is of someone realizing that this man is very important in China, [that] this man is very important for the conservation of the wall. And I hoped they would contact me." Incredibly, he was indeed later contacted by a historian at Doylestown historical society who informed him that he had just been given a collection of Geil's boxes. A quick Google search revealed to the historian that Lindesay was extremely interested in Geil. Lindesay was deservingly given full access to Geil's work, and was also given the privilege of informing Geil's family about the importance of their grandfather, who had been all but forgotten.


Recently, Lindesay has again been making headlines, having discovered a section of the Great Wall outside of China, in Mongolia. He'd been pondering the possibility of its existence in the late 90s since he knew that sections of the wall approached the China-Mongolia border. Lindesay explained, "This has become a quest to ascertain whether these are ancient dynastic Great Walls of China marooned in inner Mongolia, or to take on board what the Mongolians say about these walls, a particularly interesting story about a wall being constructed to stop the gazelle from migrating off the steppe. Because as you know, during the time of Genghis Khan these were a great food and clothing resource, and the horn was used for weapons and decorative objects." With the aid of his Atlas of Genghis Kahn and Google Earth, Lindesay located a faint line in the desert which appeared to be a wall in Mongolia. Lindesay had to go there in person in order to make comparisons with the wall in China. Lindesay was exulted to find that the wall indeed looked like a wall, up to 2.75 metres in place. "It was a mash of mud and sticks. And the sticks were a very unusual drought resistant desert shrub called saxaul… so that was a great discovery and surprise." This wall stretched up to the peak of an extinct volcano, a single peak in a sea of flatness. The view from the top was panoramic, enabling viewers to see approaching enemies or to follow the movements of gazelle.

Having seen the wall firsthand, Lindesay was particularly pleased that he'd gotten his hands on some wood samples from the wall, which would be able to be radiocarbon dated. He expected the samples to be 2100 years old, but he was amazed when the samples only turned out to be only 900 years old. "It kind of put the spanner in the works. Immediately I wondered, is this Han wall? From 2100 years ago? Then I thought because of the jigsaw theory, it matches up with the wall in China… so I'm adamant that it's Han dynasty Great Wall, but what I think the radiocarbon dating proves is that the wall was reused at some stage later." Lindesay proposed that the Western Xia dynasty rebuilt the wall in preparation against the Mongols. But this theory was not without its problems. There's no record of the western Xia dynasty building a Great Wall, so Lindesay argued that as Genghis Kahn's legacy included annihilating those who opposed him and everything that they built, it would be unsurprising to find a lack of evidence. If the western Xia dynasty's history was obliterated, Lindesay is well aware of the problems that would result from the damaged historical record. The existing history of the western Xia was written over a century later by Chinese historians employed by Mongol conquerors of China. "I think there must be a lot of questions about the accuracy, the comprehensiveness and authenticity of the records," Lindesay conceded. Undoubtedly, some of the questions around this section of the "lost" Great Wall may ultimately be unanswerable. But perhaps in Lindesay's case, the questions may be more important than the answers. "I like to either go out and prove history right or prove it wrong and dig up some questions, and this present trip from China to Outer Mongolia has been a classic case of that."

  Source: Xinhuanet.com

The real secret history of the Mongols?


Thank god for steppe hyper-patriarchy; it’s a model which we can test. Dienekes points me to a paperThe Y-chromosome C3* star-cluster attributed to Genghis Khan’s descendants is present at high frequency in the Kerey clan from Kazakhstan, which is notable for increasing sample coverage of the distribution of “Genghis Khan haplotype.” As you might recall in 2003 a paper reported that a particular Y-chromosomal phylogeny was extremely common in Central Eurasia, and, that it had expanded rather rapidly starting approximately ~1,000 years ago. The natural supposition was that this was connected to the rise of Genghis Khan, from whom male-line descent in particular has become a matter of pride and prestige across the former domains under his rule. Subsequent researchers have supported this finding insofar as the distribution of the haplotype does tend to drop off among the “Western Mongols,” who were for various reasons marginal during the time of Genghis Khan, and whose ruling class were subsequently diminished in part due to their lack of a Genghiside pedigree.

The new paper above presents the novel result that the Kereys of Kazakhstan have the highest fraction of C3* reported to date. This elite lineage claims descent from the Kerait tribe of 13th century Mongolia, which was by an large absorbed by the Mongols. The authors suggest that either the C3* star-shaped phylogeny is is actually a Kerait derived line, which piggy-backed on the rise of the Mongol Empire, or, that Keraits and Mongols share a common blood ancestry. In particular, they point out that the Khan of the Keraits, who was for a time the patron of the young Temujin (later Genghis Khan), was also the “blood brother” of Temujin’s father. Though this relationship was formed between notional non-relatives, it does not seem implausible that the Kerait and Mongol ruling dynasties were two branches of a common lineage. In particular, the Mongol elite may have been derived from the Keraits as a junior or cadet branch, as the former were relatively marginal at this period in relation to the Keraits, who as Christians of the Church of Persia (also known as ‘Nestorian’ in the West) were well integrated into the broader Eurasian ecumene.
Of course another possibility is that cuckoldry of non-Genghiside lineages was rather common in the early years of the Mongol Empire by Genghiside princes, of whom there were legion, legitimate and illegitimate. Or, perhaps the Mongol ruling clan was cuckolded by the Kerait elite before the time of Genghis Khan. They were after all likely in a position of greater power and prestige. The social science suggests that high status male lineages can rely upon relatively high fidelity of their partners. Additionally, in terms of reproductive value it is likely that in a pre-modern world elite lineages were far more prolific than the masses. The expansion of the Genghis Khan haplotype may be due to direct slaughter of enemies and acquisition of their wives, but what if it is also through less ‘honorable’ means? That is, not only were the Genghisides prolific in their own right, but they took upon themselves the reproductive rights of other elite men.
This model is interesting as far as it goes, but the key question as Y-chromosomal databases expand is what patterns we will see beginning to emerge the world over. Are most of today’s men descended from elite lineages, or the bastards of elite lineages, or cuckoldry?  A very particular Y-chromosomal distribution of lineages would then manifest itself.
 30  10 Share 0 
  
March 31st, 2012 Tags: 
by  in Anthroplogy | 3 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

3 Responses to “The real secret history of the Mongols?”

  1. 1.   dave chamberlin Says:
    apparently hearing just the lamentations of their women wasn’t good enough
  2. 2.   John Emerson Says:
    We use “Mongol” for Mongolian speakers. That’s only since Genghis Khan. Before him the Mongols (in our sense) were called Tatars by the Chinese, because the Tatars were the dominant group. In his youth Genghis was called a Borjigin and a Kiyan, and only after his triumph was he called a Mongol. I’ve read all or most of the primary sources but as far as I know how that happened is unclear. But the outcome was that Genghis united all of the Mongols (in our sense) under his leadership, adopted the clan name Mongol, and the nomads subject to him also became Mongols by that. They didn’t lose their own clan affiliations, but their clans were subsumed under “Mongol”.
    What I think is that “Borjigin” and “Kiyan” were rather minor tribes founded by two of Genghis’s ancestors, and that Genghis proclaimed a new clan starting with himself.
    Before 1206 Genghis was subordinate to the Kerait and under certain circumstances would be called a Kerait. (In the Secret History one person is called a Mongol first and then a Kerait a couple of paragraphs later.) He also could have been a Jurgin if he had wanted to, but instead of submitting to his cousins he killed them (and that was his usual practice).
    The Mongols were closer to the Kerait than to most of the Mongol subgroups, and intermarriage was routine. (Tribal exogamy was favored as part of building alliances and creating distant refuges to retreat to when necessary). When a tribe was destroyed, most of its members survived as subordinates of the victors — only the Khan and the males in his family were killed.
    Tribes were essentially functioning political-military groups embedded in a geographical-historical context. Distant relationships were remembered, but this was really just a tool diplomacy, etc. Ethnic purity was not a big concern, and neither was linguistic purity. It is thought that two of the big Mongol coalitions, the Naiman and the Khirgiz, might not have been native speakers of Mongol. (The 1200 AD Khirgiz were not closely related to the contemporary Khirgiz.)
    There’s an article by Julius Nemeth called “KEREİT KEREY GİRAY” tracing the name Kereit and its derivatives in history, as a tribal name and as a clan name. I can’t call it up at this station but as I remember, the ruling family of the Crimean Tatars was named Giray, and (unless I’m mixing this up with a different article) there’s a Giray of that family living in London.
    There’s another article “CRIMEAN TATARS, NOGAYS, AND SCOTTISH MISSIONARIES” that I can’t call up about a Giray who married into a British family

The Land of Fires on the Silk Road


Azerbaijan- The Land of Fires on the Silk Road

Azerbaigian- La Terra di Fuochi sulla Via della Seta

Exhibition in the Museo della Civiltà Romana in Rome

From February 14- April 15, 2012


This fascinating exhibition explores the history of the ancient culture of Azerbaijan in the period dating back to the explorations of Marco Polo.
The exhibition aims to explore the whole territory of Azerbaijan and will allow visitors to trace the caravan routes that ran from Baku to Gobustan, Shamakhi, Gabala, Shaki, Barda, Karabakh and Ordubad.
The exhibition explores the history of the ancient culture of Azerbaijan back to the days of Marco Polo and presents ancient stones of the villages that date back over 20,000 years, now part of UNESCO’s World Heritage.
Of the same period are the antique silk rugs on display together with other archaeological finds of great interest.