Tuesday, 12 June 2012

Terracotta acrobats found in Xi'an


Watch Video

The latest excavation at the Qin Shihuang mausoleum in Xi’an, the capital of northwest China’s Shaanxi province, has been underway since 2009. Scientists have recently released the latest findings, secrets that have been buried under the earth for thousands of years.
The pit covers an area of 600 square meters and excavation has been ongoing since last year. Unlike previous discoveries, the finds here are mostly of acrobatic figurines.
Archaeologist Zhang Weixing said, "These terracotta figurines are of the acrobats who performed in the imperial palace. During the Qin Dynasty, these people were called ’Bai Xi’. These terracotta figurines were mortuary objects."
During the Qin Dynasty two thousand years ago, "Bai Xi" artists often gave acrobatic and wrestling performances to the emperor. Revered for their strength, the performers were said to be able to shoulder tremendous weights upon their shoulders.
One stands more than two meters tall and sports a pair of gigantic feet. Scholars say this performer probably served as a sort of base - holding aloft team-mates during their performances. Unfortunately, most of the artifacts have been are badly damaged and some even burned.
Luckily, though, there’s still more to discover. Scientists have unearthed a number of additional and puzzling objects - including a bronze ball and a giant tripod. Archaeologists say that they have never seen such things before. It seems Xi’an continues to offer food for curiosity.

Sunday, 10 June 2012

New terracotta warriors unearthed

From Xinhuanet.com  June10, 2012

Photo taken on June 9, 2012 shows the newly unearthed terracotta warrior which was painted with colors at the No. 1 pit of the Museum of Qin Shihuang Terracotta Warriors and Horses in Xi'an, capital of northwest China's Shaanxi Province. Since the third excavation started in June of 2009, more than 100 terracotta warriors as well as terracotta horses and chariots have been unearthed at the No. 1 pit within the mausoleum complex of Qin Shihuang (259-210 BC), the founder of China's first unified feudal empire, the Qin Dynasty (221-206 BC). (Xinhua/Li Yibo) Archaeologists clean the newly unearthed terracotta warrior. Photo taken on June 9, 2012 shows the newly unearthed terracotta warrior which was painted with colors at the No. 1 pit of the Museum of Qin Shihuang Terracotta Warriors and Horses in Xi'an.


Archaeologists clean the newly unearthed terracotta warrior at the No.1 pit of the Museum of Terracotta Warriors and Horses of Qin Shihuang in Xi’an, Shaanxi Province, on Saturday.
Experts have found more terracotta warriors and wares in a new round of archaeological excavation at the Emperor Qin Shihuang's mausoleum, as well as evidence that the mausoleum was once set on fire, according to the site's management authority.
The Museum of the Terracotta Warriors and Horses of Emperor Qin Shihuang (259-210 BC) announced on Saturday that in the third round of excavation, archaeologists found more than 310 relics at the northern part of the No.1 pit, including 120 terracotta figurines and 12 horses.
Among the findings is a giant warrior that is 2.5 meters tall with a pair of 32-centimeter feet and a lacquered leather shield 60 centimeters long and 40 centimeters wide, twice the size of a bronze shield found in the 1980s in the No.1 pit.
New findings have shown that each terracotta figurine has its own facial expression.
In another finding, the terracotta armor on the figurine of a general had been produced more intricately than those of other figurines. Experts have found a large number of wares with well-preserved color paintings on them, and colors were also found on terracotta clothes, said Xu Weihong, an excavation team leader, the Xi'an-based Sanqin Daily reported.
"We first speculated that the colors on the relics would not be well preserved, but now we are finding lots of colorful paintings on the terracotta wares and lacquered wares," Xu said.
"Experts thought all the colors would fade, but so many colorful paintings were found," said archaeologist team leader Shen Maosheng.
Archaeologists found that the figurines in the passageways had been burned out of shape and some had even melted. They also discovered white ashes, caused by a high-temperature fire, proving that someone had deliberately set fire to the terracotta warriors, archaeologists said.
"The figurines were broken by humans, and the fire caused different degrees of damage to the figurines at different places," said Shen. Xiang Yu, a prominent military leader during the late Qin Dynasty (221-206 BC), is believed to be the one who ordered the mausoleum to be set on fire, Shen Maosheng said, an assertion most archaeologists agree with.
The new round of excavations started June 13, 2009, with authorities arranging for protective measures and exhibitions to be held continuously in the past three years. About 1.4 million visitors have visited and observed the excavation at the site.

Source: Globaltimes.cn June11,2012

Genetic and cultural power of the mongols



editorial Byamba2Prof.,Dr.Bayasakh.J .K,SFS,NUM
Mongolia and the Mongols have a tremendous history and have played a significant role in world history.Until recently,it was unclear how the Mongol race appeared in world history, where they came from, and where their homeland was in the pre-historical time period. How and when did they come to their present day territory, settle and become a homogeneous nation after having a thousand year confrontation with other Eurasian nationalities like Scythian, Avars, Sarmats, Kipchack, Hazars, Turks and others? Is the present day Mongolian territory the homeland of Kirgiz, Uighur and Turkic khanates? Is it a frontier of confrontation between the Turkic and Mongol origin nationalities? Who isthe real owner of that territory? What did the ancient Mongols look like? How are the present day Turkic nationalities different from each other? Did this change come from historical development and interactions? How did the Mongols survive the historical mixture and confrontations? Are the Mongols genetically stronger than the other races? Who was the main player of the region? There are many questions we face today as we look for the right answer.

ANCIENT MONGOLIAN HISTORY

The present day Mongolian territory was the arena of an active intercultural crossroads as it was used by many Eurasian nationalities subsisting on cattle breeding as their main economy which its vast land was suitable for. Many nationalities were to rise and fall on that land. The arid continental climate determined and dictated the method of survival as only animal husbandry or stock breeding was suitable as a way of life. The early medieval history of this land experienced the rise and fall of many nationalities. The Huns were the first big khanate, becoming an empire which went on to conquer part of Europe and drive many nationalities to consolidate and establish state hoods when confronted with Attila the Hun’s army. Attila was a danger to all of Europe and thanks to him, present day France, Germany, and Britain were established. Part of the Hun Empire entered the present day Russian southern frontier and inhabited the region. Other nationalities with different names such as the Scythians, Avars, Sarmats, Kipchacks and Hazarians have disappeared from history or assimilated with stronger nations like the Mongols.
It is well known that the Hun Empire has a nomadic origin and the Huns were a mongoloid type of race. The geneticists and anthropologists agree that the Mongols originated from the Huns by analyzing their DNA. The Hun Empire was proto-Mongol state. During that time, Asia and Europe were connected with each other by the Silk Road and cross culture activities between the two continents were established.
When the Hun Empire collapsed, the first world migration happened. Part of their brethren came to Europe through the Ural Mountain and settled in Central Europe, renamed as the Hungarians. The rest went on to live in the southern region of Russia and were known by ethnic namessuch as the Scythians, Sarmats, Avars, Kipchack, Hazarians.
During the following dynasties were established or risen several states in the territories of Eurasia the mongoloid nations were assimilated with the locals and disappeared from the world history. Only the million of the hazars live in Afghanistan. As we know the hazars were nomads and as well as settled people who worked in agriculture and have the sedentary life. The Kipchacks was under the Mongol rule during the Great Mongol State and they were good horseman and taught the Mongols how to herd the horses and how to make the permitted drink “airag” or” koumiss” (1, pp. ).
After the Hun Empire, the Sumbe (Syanbi) Khanate was established which is known by Chinese sources asSyanbi. They utilized the best aspects from previous Empire and also had intensive cross culture relations with other Eurasians,having some control over them. After this cultural group,the Mongolian territory saw the advent of the Nirun khanate, which is known as a Jujan by Chinese sources. The Persian historian, Rashid ad Din’s book termed them as“Darligin.” Mongolian scholar,G.Sukhbaatar, approved the Jujans as Darliginsin his brilliant research.A state named Nirun (p. 2) was created by them.With the collapse of that khanate, the territory of Mongolia saw several hundred years of non-Mongolian states rise to power, namely the Turks, Uighurs and Kyrgyzs. During these centuries, we saw a significant influence from the Turkic language, and also adopted Uighur letters from the Sogdo-Arameisof Iran. Many present day geographic names still have Turkic words which are hard to explain the meaning of. All of these khanates had the same main economy of animal husbandry and the nomadic way of life. This group had the same nutrition, dwellings, transport, clothes,and way of dressing and probably the mentality was nomadic. During recent years, archeologists found artifacts from that time-period which shows that during the existence of above-mentioned khanates, they had very intensive cross-culture relations similar to the Hun Empire of the Silk Road time-period. Archeologists founda large amount of golden coins and porcelain products, such as bowls, which were used during the Roman Empire and the Byzantine period. They also found an Egyptian pharaoh statue, a Tang statue of musicians and a dragon wall-drawing. In that time-period, Mongols had a huge influence on the outside world and had interactions with and borrowed some for their future development.

GREAT MONGOL EMPIRE AS THE CENTER OF CROSS CULTURAL ACTIVITY

The first mention of Mongols appears in the Chinese annals of ”Xin Tang shu” and “Jiu Tang shu” and are named “mengwu” and “menwa”. Later, in the 13th century, Mongols were named “menggusi”. In my book, I wrote about how the Chinese termed Mongol ethnic names in their historical sources. According my research, the ethnic name of the Mongols appeared around the eight and the ninth century. At the tenth century the “Khamag Mongol” khanate created a state, used until now. The meaning of that name has been explained by many scholars all over the world. The explanation I give it is like those who rise and grow up living near the” Mungunuul (Silver mountain)” with a suffix of plural of the Mongolian “l” and named like” Mongols”(1).The Mongols previously had power in the present day Eurasian territories and were influenced by other ethnicities’ names. But most of these ethnicities were pushed out from Mongolia and moved on to another place, searching a peaceful and quiet life.
Before the Khamag Mongol statehood was established, most parts of Mongolia were under the reign of the Kitan (Qidan) Liao Empire. They had two types of letters--one named as a small letter, another named as a big letter. Inner Mongolian scholar, Chingeltei, discovered within the small lettering several Mongolian words like gahai, tahia, nohoi, which means pig, chicken and dog. Among nine generals or ministries of the Great Khan’s cabinet, EluiChucai has a kitan origin and a wise minister who taught the Mongols how to use the taxation system among the Northern Chinese, who fell under the Mongol rule in the first half of the thirteenth century which increased the income for rulers etc. The successor of the kitans had a family name like Xiao or Hsiao and they lived among the Chinese of Mainland China and Taiwan. They were identified by a blue mark on their back when they were children which disappeared before age six or seven. That blue mark has been seen among Mongols, Koreans, Japanese and Hungarians and most of the northern Chinese. That is the genetic mark of those with a Mongol origin. When the successor of the Kitans came to Mongolia and listened to the faint sound of the horse head fiddle, they usually fell into the lyric’s sentiments and easily cried over it. The horse head fiddle is the traditional Mongolian instrument, registered by UNESCO as a world heritage item. The historical past tells us about the sentimental power of the music and melody. Nowadays, Mongols use this instrument’s melody to make a mother camel accept her baby camel if she hates or dislikes it. After hearing that instrument, the mother cameldrops down and accepts her baby. It’s an interesting and memorable event. You can observe it if you will go to a nomad family in Mongolia.
The main historical source of Mongolian medieval history is the Secret History of Mongols, written in 1240 by unknown author. The Mongolian original was lost while the Chinese character written version exists. The scholars from around the world are still researching it and trying to recover the Mongol origin. The Mongolian text was written into Chinese characters and translated into Chinese which was found by the Russian missionary,Kafarov, at the end of the nineteenth century in China. We have found three versions of this significant source written in the Chinese script. All the versions are different. This monument to time tells us about the origin of the Mongols before the birth of Chinggis (Genghis) khan and described well his previous 25 generations of genealogy. Scholars have recognized this monument as the main Mongolian source of history, ethnography, culture, literature and religion. In one word it is the main Mongolian written encyclopedia and all recognize it as a wonderful legacy to world civilization. It has already been translated into all the main languages of the world.
Except for the Secret History of Mongols, Mongols have also written some historical epics like “Jangar” and ”Geser”.
These two historical epics are also recognized as treasures of literature and studied by scholars all around the world. Jangar was popular among the western Mongols and story tellers retold over seven days and nights. It was written in classic Mongolian and the Tod Mongolian letter as well. Western Mongolians in China, Russia and Mongolia recognize it still as a main canon about their origins. In Xinjiang Autonomous Region of PRC there exist some temples dedicated to this epos of Jangar and Mongols within this region go to these temples to pray. Dozens of books are dedicated to this unique epos and have been published in many countries.
Mongolia in the thirteenth century was a center of the world development as well as a center of the cultural cross-road. The best architect and handicrafts were used in the construction of the capital of the Empire of Kharakhorum. Since the late 1940’s we have studying the archeological excavation of that colorful ruin.
As mentioned before, Mongolia grew from a nomadic civilization and I researched this topic. As I noted, the world civilization could be divided into two types: sedentary and nomadic. Two different forces hold them. Namely the centripetal force determines sedentary civilizationsas to why individualism and institutions are stronger there than in nomadic civilizations, in which the centrifugal force determines it to be less institutionalized with less attention paid to cultural or material heritage. Therefore sedentary civilizationshave preserved their materialistic culture better than the nomadic civilizations have (2, pp. 115-125).
With the collapse of imperial powers all over the world such as in Russia (1480), China (1368), Persia (1370-1372) and the rest of the world, the Mongols fell in stagnation and anarchy and lost their dominance. From the end of the seventeenth century until 1911, they became subjects of the Manchu Qing Dynasty. In that time period the Mongols lost their braveness and fell into the Lamaism sect of the Buddhism, spending more time praying and starting to deeply believe in reincarnation. With the adoption of Lamaism in Mongolia, the 1600’s saw the intellectual life of Mongols follow in their influence. Mongols learnt Sanskrit,the Tibetan written language and its historical literature. We became more religious and Mongolian books were burned during the reign of Ligdeng khan(mid the seventeenth century). The printing of Buddhist literature was developed. When Mongolia fell under the Manchu domination, we started to learn Manchurian, using it until 1911.The Manchus used the Mongolian classical letter as their state letter until their overthrow in 1911.During their domination, the Mongols learned Chinese and translated all the Chinese classics--including Confucian literature, Chinese poetry and novels like:”Jin Ping Mei”,” Hong loumeng”,” San guoyanyi” and” Shuihuzhuan” etc.
Our genesis came from the Huns (Xiongnu) and we have same DNA. The Mongoloid race came from the Mongols and spread into the Eurasia area. We had many centuries of ties with other Eurasians of which some of them still exist now or were assimilated with others during history. Mongolia is holder of the nomadic way of life, historically living in harmony with nature while confronting with sedentary civilizations. We took part in the ancient history of mankind and drove the creation of many states in both continents while leaving our trace on their histories. When Mongolia was a super power in medieval history, we drove Russians and Chinese to unite and helped them create their own statehood. We influenced the political life of many countries and contributed value totheir politics whilecreatingour own order under the Mongol rule and reign. Our geographical location lies in the middle of cross-cultural territory, constantly utilized as a cross road for different civilizations. Mongols historically were tolerant towards other religions and were never in the field of fighting over religion, having believedfor many millenniums in “Tenger” (sky) or heaven. Mongolia surprises the world with it rich archeological treasures. Mongolia offers a rich written monument and historical source.

From: UB Post

Precise length of Great Wall: 21,196.18 km



Watch Video

Play Video
Precisely, how long is the Great Wall? This has been a long-unanswered question, as many dynasties in Chinese history built, modified or extended the Great Wall. But now, the State Administration of Cultural Heritage has announced a definite number after a seven-year investigation.
Twenty-one thousand one hundred and ninety-six point one eight Kilometers (21,196.18 km), That is the precise length of the Great Wall, which was included as a World Heritage Site in 1987.
Twenty-one thousand one hundred and ninety-six point one eight
Kilometers (21,196.18 km), That is the precise length of the Great
Wall, which was included as a World Heritage Site in 1987.
Built over two thousand years ago, the Great Wall is one of the largest construction projects ever completed. It's a series of fortifications made of stone, brick, wood and other materials built across the historical northern borders to ward off invaders.
Although it is also called "wan Li Chang Cheng", which means ten-thousand li long wall in Chinese, this is only a description for a very, very long wall.
To get the precise length of the man-made masterpiece, the State Administration of Cultural Heritage began surveying the wall in 2006. More than 2,000 technicians worked on the comprehensive survey using state-of-the-art technology, in 15 provinces, municipalities and autonomous regions. The project proved to be very difficult as the Great Wall zigzags and winds up and down mountain edges and valleys.
Twenty-one thousand one hundred and ninety-six point one eight
Kilometers (21,196.18 km), That is the precise length of the
Great Wall, which was included as a World Heritage Site in 1987.
Twenty-one thousand one hundred and ninety-six point one eight
Kilometers (21,196.18 km), That is the precise length of the
Great Wall, which was included as a World Heritage Site in 1987.

Related stories

Source: CNNTV.cn

Tuesday, 5 June 2012

Chinese ancient books sell for $ 34.2 mln.


BEIJING, June 4 (Xinhua) -- Ancient Chinese books have been auctioned off for 216 million yuan (34.2 million U.S. dollars) in Beijing, the auction house said Monday night.
A collection of 1,292 ancient books from Guo Yunlou, a library belonging to the Guo family in Suzhou of east China's Jiangsu province, was sold to a private buyer at the 2012 Beijing Council Spring Auction on Monday night.
The auction began at 9:35 p.m. and started with a bidding price of 180 million yuan. A buyer finalized the bidding at the price of 188 million yuan. The total cost is 216 million yuan including commission fees.
The deal will be finally realized after the buyer pays all the expenses within the required period of time, according to the auction rules.
After six generations, in about 150 years of heritage since the reign of Emperor Daoguang in the Qing Dynasty (1820-1849), Guoyunlou's collection has reached more than 800 kinds including block-printed editions from the Song Dynasty (960-1279) and Yuan Dynasty (1271-1368), fine writing and old copies as well as inscriptions from the Ming Dynasty (1368-1644) and Qing Dynasty (1644-1911).
Three quarters of the Guoyunlou collection were bought by the Nanjing Library in early 1990s, while the remaining 1292 books of 179 titles are still kept by some private collectors.
The remaining 1,292 books were bought by a private buyer at an auction in 2005 at the price of 23.1 million yuan.
The encyclopedia of Splendid Valley of Flowers, the only existing and well-preserved copy handed down from the Song Dynasty, is the eye-catcher of the Guoyunlou collection.
Written in 40 books bound in 80 volumes, the encyclopedia is the world's largest Song edition. It has significant value in academic and history research as it has the content of some lost ancient books, said Fan Jingzhong, a professor from the China Academy of Art.

Kilns excavated in Hebei


Watch Video

Play Video
A new archaeological site has been discovered in Hebei Province. Experts discovered a porcelain workshop with six kilns and a large area of buried fragments. Judging from its size and style, the site could date back to before the Sui or Tang Dynasty.
Waking up from a long thousand-year sleep, the porcelain has been unearthed from its burial just beside where it was made. In a scatter of kilns, the edges of these small windows have been burned a dark blue color. It was through the windows that raw wares were sent into the kiln, to set their shape and color. They were then packed on their thousand-mile journey to South Asia and even farther across the globe to Europe. Experts say the multi-window kiln is quite rare.
A new archaeological site has been discovered in Hebei Province. Experts
discovered a porcelain workshop with six kilns and a large area
of buried fragments.
Wang Huimin, Cultural Relics Researcher, said, "Firewood and raw wares were transported in and out through the windows which face different directions. One person could handle two or three at a time. It was quite convenient."
Among the fragments excavated from beside the kilns, tri-colored pottery has been found. This provides the evidence tracing the kilns to the time around the Sui or Tang Dynasty.
A new archaeological site has been discovered in Hebei Province. Experts
discovered a porcelain workshop with six kilns and a large area of
buried fragments.
Wang Huimin said, "This piece of a bowl comes from the Sui Dynasty. It's thicker as it gets deeper. The glaze and the shape, as well as the tails, all indicate its age. Experts have long been haunted by the questions of: What was a kiln like before the Sui Dynasty? Were pottery and porcelain made together or separately? This site might provide the answers to these questions. "
The kilns were accidentally discovered by a new construction project at the site. While further study is ongoing, experts say the discovery has great significance for the history of porcelain-making in China.
A new archaeological site has been discovered in
Hebei Province. Experts discovered a porcelain
workshop with six kilns and a large area
of buried fragments.
A new archaeological site has been discovered in
Hebei Province. Experts discovered a porcelain
workshop with six kilns and a large area of
buried fragments.

Source: CNTV.com

Monday, 4 June 2012

Xuanzang and the "Records of the Western Regions"


Abstracts:
Timothy H. Barrett, “The Xiyu-ji and Chinese Historiography”
Although a considerable quantity of Buddhist and non-Buddhist literature survives from the first millennium of the Common Era describing the world as the Chinese knew it, the Xiyu ji is generally regarded as representing the apogee of detailed Chinese knowledge of other parts of the world during this period.  Certainly it provides a clear picture of China as but one of a number of civilisations which remained part of the heritage of Chinese knowledge of the wider world for as long as it was read or its influence was indirectly felt.  Yet Xuanzang, for all his travels, did not arrive at his own appreciation of China’s place in the world; rather, he drew on earlier traditions of knowledge.  These require examination.  Equally, there is no reason to assume that once the Xiyu jiitself no longer represented current knowledge its picture of the world receded entirely in importance.  No matter how sharply China turned inwards, the broader conception of the inhabited world captured in its pages still survived in some unremarked but quite important contexts.

Max Deeg, “The ‘Record of the Western Regions’ Between Chinese Text and Western Historical Imagination”
The Xiyu-ji (‘Record of the Western Regions’) has been used, since its first translation into a Western language through the French sinologist Stanislas Julien, as a source for the study of Buddhist and history in general of Central Asia and India in a assumedly positivist-objective way without really questioning the hermeneutical approach to the text in its Chinese historical context. This has led, paradoxically, to a “romanticized” view of the text as the personal account of a Chinese Buddhist monk of his travels through Central Asia and India which is historically correct and precise in its description which was, however, influenced by a confusion with another text, the Xuanzang-biography (Ciensi-sanzang-fashi-zhuan). The paper will present some examples where this confusion has resulted in an imagined Western historical reality which does not take into account the intentionality of the original text of the Xiyu-ji.

Antonello Palumbo, “Between religious disputation and imperial  mentorship: Xuanzang as Buddhist partisan and ideologist”
Xuanzang's astonishing life is usually labelled under two main rubrics: the travelling monk, author of the Xiyu ji and first-hand knower of Indian and Central Asian Buddhism; and the consummate scholar, impeccable translator of scores of Sanskrit texts and expert of Yogācāra doctrine. Far less studied is Xuanzang's involvement in court politics and in the ideological argument of his days, which saw him as the single most authoritative spokesman for the elite Buddhist clergy between 645 and 664. This paper will offer a preliminary exploration of this intriguing facet of Xuanzang's life, focusing on his role in the Buddhist-Taoist polemic and his exchanges with the throne, as recorded especially in the Si shamen Xuanzang shangbiao ji.

Tokio Takata, “Old Japanese Manuscript Copies of the Da Tang Xiyu ji and Their Value”
A considerable number of manuscript copies of the Da Tang Xiyuji have been transmitted until now in Japan. They were hand-copied by Japanese Buddhist monks in the Heian period (794-1185) and theKamakura period (1185-1333). The oldest one even dates back to 785 AD ( 4th year of Enryaku延暦), much older than Dunhuang manuscript fragments. The text of these Japanese manuscript copies differ in many cases from the text extant in the printed editions of the Chinese Tripitakas, and considered to represent an earlier version of the work, i.e. the text of the Tang period. They are extremely important for establishing a critical edition of the Da Tang Xiyuji. The paper attempts to shed light on the scope and nature of the emendation undertaken in the Tang court by collating all the seven ancient Japanese manuscripts available to us now, the Dunhuang fragments, and the versions in the Tripitakas.

Giovanni Verardi, “Xuanzang’s Account as Testimony of the Difficulties Faced by Buddhism in the Second Half of the Sixth and at the Beginning of the Seventh Century”
The dismal state of Buddhism in many regions of India as reflected in the Xiyuji has been the object of various evaluations, although we can say that it has been mostly attributed to a long process of decay coupled with external factors such as the invasion of the Hūṇas. But it is more appropriate to single out two periods of crisis, the first of which corresponds to the establishment of the Gupta dynasty and the acceleration of the process of Brahmanical colonization of a large part of the Indian fertile lands and the imposition of varṇāśramadharma (fourth and early fifth century).
As to the second period of crisis, it was due to the formation, in the sixth century, of regional states modelled on the Gupta state and politics in the Deccan and in Bengal, and to the instrumental use by the Brahmans of the foreign invaders, who were directed, as for instance in Gandhāra, against the representatives of the religion of Dharma. The Xiyuji mirrors this second period of crisis, although it was conceived when Harṣavardhana, for about half a century, succeeded in creating a powerful bulwark against Brahmanical revivalism.

Dorothy Wong, “Xuanzang as an Agent of Artistic Transmission”
The accomplishments of Xuanzang are multifaceted. This paper examines the role this celebrated pilgrim-monk played in the transmission of Buddhist art from India to China, and the subsequent impact he had on East Asian Buddhist art. From the icons he brought back to China to his own personal devotional focus and the Buddhist texts that he translated, he directly and indirectly contributed to the dissemination of a new Indian Buddhist art style as well as generated interests in new subjects. Some of the topics investigated in this paper include the Buddha type associated with Bodhigaya (with right hand in earth-touching gesture), renewed interests in devotion to Maitreya and Avalokiteśvara, the practice of dedicating numerous stamped clay tablets, and also Xuanzang’s request of the building of a stūpa in Indian style.

Hellenistic Sculpture


    Hellenistic Sculpture (Classic Reprint)
  • Hellenistic Sculpture
  • by Guy Dickens

  • Paperback: 160 pages
  • Publisher: Forgotten Books (18 May 2012)
  • Language English
  • ISBN-10: 144003415X

As an undergraduate Guy Dickins gave up his intention of entering the Indian Civil Service in order to devote himself to the study of Classical Archaeology, an allegiance from which he never swerved. In 1904 he went as Craven Fellow to the British School of Athens and for five years lived mostly in Greece, studying and exploring. In 1909 he returned to Oxford as a Fellow of St.John's College and Lecturer in Ancient History. In 1914 he was appointed University Lecturer in Classical Archaeology; but before he could take up the duties of the post the great call came and he obeyed it at once. A most efficient and able company commander, he served in the King's Royal Rifle Corps. In July 1916 he died of wounds received in the battle of the Somme. Before the war Dickins had been occupied in tasks of research and in preparation for a teaching career. He had published several papers and a volume of the catalogue of the Acropolis Museum. He had visited most of the museums of Europe and brought back a large collection of photographs which his widow has presented to the Ashmolean Museum.

Sunday, 3 June 2012

The Bamiyan Buddhas will not be rebuilt


The Bamiyan Buddhas will not be rebuilt, says Unesco. The architect Andrea Bruno proposes a scheme that focuses reverently on their absence
The empty niche of the Great Buddha in 2010. “The void is the true sculpture,” says Andrea Bruno (inset), Afghanistan’s most seasoned conservation architect
When Andrea Bruno, an architectural consultant to Unesco for the past 40 years, went back to the Bamiyan Buddhas, blown up in March 2001 by the Taliban, he immediately scrapped all ideas he might have had about some sort of replacement. “The void is the true sculpture,” he says. “It stands disembodied witness to the will, thoughts and spiritual tensions of men long gone. The immanent presence of the niche, even without its sculpture, represents a victory for the monument and a defeat for those who tried to obliterate its memory with dynamite.”
Two years after the destruction, the Japanese National Research Institute for Cultural Properties, working through Unesco and the Afghan authorities, began putting money into clearing up the site and consolidating the surfaces of the niches. The aim at this point was to recreate the Buddhas, an immensely ambitious project since the larger of the two was taller than the Tower of Pisa. 

But there were doubts from the first whether this was the right approach. There have been other proposals, from laser projections of Buddhas onto the cliff face—unrealistic in a part of the world that barely has electricity—to a plan from the University of Aachen to attach the remaining fragments to the niche wall on a metal frame—unsatisfactory because hardly any of the stone carving remains intact, the Buddhas having been hewn all in one piece out of the living rock, which was therefore reduced to rubble by the explosions. 

What is more, Andrea Bruno, who knows the country intimately, having led the conservation of the fort at Herat and the minaret of Jam over many years, believes that such solutions do not take the sensibilities of the Afghans into account. Rebuilding the Buddhas would inevitably be politically loaded, he says, besides causing religious offence. “Here the Muslims strictly oppose images; to recreate the Buddhas would be an insult even to non-Taliban Afghans. We must show good manners,” he says. In fact, after ten years, the Unesco meeting on Bamiyan held in Tokyo in December 2011 announced finally that the Great Buddha would not be recreated, and the smaller Buddha was unlikely to be.

Bruno has a proposal, however, which he describes as ecumenical, and which, above all, aims to enhance the emotional and aesthetic experience of viewing the empty niche. His idea is to create an underground viewing space at the foot of the Great Buddha. He calls this a sanctuary, alluding to the numerous sanctuaries within the cliff. For the two Buddhas were part of a complex extending over a kilometre of cliff-face, honeycombed by passages connecting hundreds of decorated caves once inhabited by Buddhist monks, and now lived in by the poorest of the local villagers. Stairs leading up and then down into the sanctuary would enhance the feeling of entering a concealed sacred space, like a Bronze Age barrow. At the end of the chamber, there would be a small replica of the Great Buddha, with light streaming in on it from a circular opening above, through which the visitor’s gaze would be focused on the grandeur of the void, in the same way as James Turrell frames the sky and makes you see it with particular intensity.

The other part of the visit would take you into the tunnels inside the cliff, up to a circular aperture above where the head of the Buddha used to be. Pilgrims travelling along the Silk Route used to come here and look out over the Bamiyan Valley, so Bruno has designed a small viewing platform, which would be completely dismountable. He emphasises that nothing in his design would be environmentally or visually intrusive, and could all be built with local skills in a matter of months rather than years. 

The local people are Hazaras, Shia Muslims who were persecuted by the Taliban, and while enjoying relative peace at present, they have seen their already low standard of living reduced further by the loss of the Buddhas, which used to bring them travellers. They had no hand in their destruction and would like to have something to offer tourists when travel becomes possible again. 

Bruno’s sanctuary would be the centrepiece of a much broader programme, announced at the last Unesco meeting on the subject, in December 2011 in Tokyo, which includes de-mining, archaeological excavations, conservation of the cave sanctuaries and their wall decorations, instructing the population on the importance of archaeological remains, and creating a Museum for Peace and a museum for the few fragments of carved stone that survived the dynamiting. Bruno sees all this as the very least the developed world can do to make up for the cultural damage it has done to the Afghans, from broadcasting rubbishy, consumerist TV channels into their homes to having failed to give them alternatives to bad modernist architecture. He estimates that his sanctuary project could be built for under €400,000 and would be a considerable boost to local morale as well as homage to the majesty of the figures that presided over the valley for one and a half millennia. 

As for the decision not to recreate the Buddhas, it can be seen as the wheel of history turning full circle. In the first century AD, it was this part of the world, ancient Gandhara, that with its Hellenistic sculptural tradition first gave Buddha his physical form. Until then, Buddha had been represented by his absence—an empty throne or a footprint—and now in Bamiyan he is present once again in an empty niche.